[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?
From: |
Galen Boyer |
Subject: |
Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex? |
Date: |
24 Jun 2003 22:40:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, gabaux@freemail.hu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would NOT suggest to switch to XML/docbook. We are using
> it at the company, and each team-member has a slightly
> divverent version of docbook tools, what is making the lifa
> a boiling hot hell.
Hm... I will be enforcing this by having all of docbook coming
from CVS. Whether one uses Emacs, notepad or ArborText, they
must use the docbook distribution in CVS. Are you doing this and
still having issues?
--
Galen Boyer
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, (continued)
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Martin Stemplinger, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Jeffery B. Rancier, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, address@hidden, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/24
- Message not available
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Urban Gabor, 2003/06/23
- RE: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Dmitri . Minaev, 2003/06/24
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?,
Galen Boyer <=