|
From: | Marco Antoniotti |
Subject: | Re: Differences between Elisp and Lisp |
Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:23:01 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016 |
Johan Bockgård wrote:
From gnu.emacs.help, followup-to set to gnu.emacs.help "Daniel R. Anderson" writes: >On emacswiki.org there is a "wish list". Quite a few people want >emacs to be based on another version of LISP. Out of curiosity, what >is it that makes elisp inherently bad, or why would people want it >to be changed?
I'll skip the first one. For the second I'd wager that people *know* that Common Lisp is the right answer and people would love to see RMS admit that he messed up royally by promoting Guile :)
Cheers -- Marco Antoniotti
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |