[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Unicode Bison
From: |
Frédéric Morin |
Subject: |
RE: Unicode Bison |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:50:35 -0400 |
I forgot to say that is character above 256 !
:)
-----Original Message-----
From: Frédéric Morin
Sent: 11 avril, 2002 14:25
To: 'address@hidden'
Subject: RE: Unicode Bison
Sorry I don't understand what you are saying.
Suppose I have a SELECT [unicode character] FROM table
Did the lex can recognize unicode character ?
How I defined unicode character in the definition of the lex ???
Eg: UNICODE [a-zUNICODE ???]
Thanks
Fred
-----Original Message-----
From: Akim Demaille [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 11 avril, 2002 12:14
To: Frédéric Morin
Cc: 'address@hidden'
Subject: Re: Unicode Bison
>>>>> "Frédéric" == Frédéric Morin <address@hidden> writes:
Frédéric> Hi ! is there a unicode bison version ? or what can I do to
Frédéric> transform flex and bison to be compliant with unicode ?
No, you don't need to transform Bison. All you need to take care of,
is returning tokens (i.e., something defined with %token). Don't have
your scanner return non ASCII characters.