[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#35288] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add dumb.
From: |
Kei Kebreau |
Subject: |
[bug#35288] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add dumb. |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Apr 2019 16:37:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/music.scm (dumb): New variable.
>
> [...]
>
>> + (home-page "https://github.com/kode54/dumb")
>> + (synopsis "Module audio renderer library")
>> + (description
>> + "DUMB is a tracker library with support for IT, XM, S3M and MOD
>> files. It
>> +targets maximum accuracy to the original formats, with low-pass
>> resonant filters
>> +for the IT files, accurate timing and pitching, and three resampling quality
>> +settings (aliasing, linear interpolation and cubic interpolation).")
>> + (license (license:fsf-free "file://LICENSE"))))
>
> This looks good, but the license deserves close reading (which I haven’t
> done). What’s your interpretation of it? It would be nice to put a
> comment above to summarize our findings.
>
I've added the comment below in the patch summarizing my interpretation
of the DUMB license:
;; The DUMB license is a bit peculiar.
;; Clause 8 states that clauses 4, 5 and 6 are null and void, leaving only
;; the first three clauses for genuine consideration.
;; Clauses 1, 2 and 3 are analogous to clauses 1, 2 and 3 of the zlib
;; license, a known free software license.
;; Therefore, the DUMB license may be considered a free software license.
What do you think?
>> +(define-public vcvrack
>> + (package
>> + (name "vcvrack")
>> + (version "0.6.2b")
>
> What’s this doin’ here? :-)
>
Very basic packaging work on some other software, whoops!
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature