[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#34586] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: emacs-dash: Update to 2.15.0.
From: |
Brett Gilio |
Subject: |
[bug#34586] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: emacs-dash: Update to 2.15.0. |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:18:11 -0600 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
Brett Gilio writes:
> From 12c8c9ffab36fa29d202c6aca632dea476739e58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Brett Gilio <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:00:34 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: emacs-dash: Update to 2.15.0.
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-dash): Update to 2.15.0.
> ---
> gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> index 75fc97471..0bea870e6 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> @@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ and stored in memory.")
> (define-public emacs-dash
> (package
> (name "emacs-dash")
> - (version "2.14.1")
> + (version "2.15.0")
> (source (origin
> (method git-fetch)
> (uri (git-reference
> @@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ and stored in memory.")
> (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> (sha256
> (base32
> - "1kzijmjxjxgr7p8clphzvmm47vczckbs8mza9an77c25bn627ywl"))))
> + "0dx8q3jr8fh73cfl7mqi5dq0012ambpvc74d2c71fsv9rfw85693"))))
> (build-system emacs-build-system)
> (arguments
> `(#:tests? #t
So, this update to dash contains a `listp' functions that isn't
available in earlier versions, as well as updates to a dash-functional
module. These updates are needed for the lsp-mode and lsp-ui patches I
sent in this series.
As usual, I made sure all dependencies are building correctly with the
dash update to 2.15.0, and I came across a failing build for
`emacs-json-mode'. However, this failing build seems unrelated to the
change in dash and has something to do with upstream.
So, while I know that people are going to want to make sure that all of
our packages that depend on dash are still working (and I encourage you
to check before somebody pushes this to master), just know that specific
failure seems to be unrelated.
Best,
Brett Gilio