[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [outreachy] Further steps
From: |
Laura Lazzati |
Subject: |
Re: [outreachy] Further steps |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Oct 2018 16:01:32 -0300 |
Hi!
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 5:36 AM Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hello Laura,
>
> Laura Lazzati <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2018.
> okt. 28., V, 2:52):
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:06 PM Ricardo Wurmus
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Laura,
> > >
> > > >> > > I would like you to come up with an initial proposal, and then
> > > >> > > iterate on that.
> > > >> > Ok, I have the initial Outreachy project next to me. I will take a
> > > >> > look at everything there, and write down a proposal, during the
> > > >> > following days, WDYT?
> > > >>
> > > >> Ok, that would be great.
> > > > I have one last question: do I need to follow a specific format?
> > > > ie: a template or just writing down in plain text:
> > > > From date/week number up to date/week number: and a TODO list of tasks?
> > >
> > > Plain text is fine. It only needs to clearly communicate your intent.
> > Sorry, I wrote some ideas in the discussion thread about the videos.
> > I have one last question about the timeline:
> > How much in depth I need to detail what I am thinking of doing each
> > week/s? Is it ok writing a general idea,
> > For example:
> > Week 1: learn the necessary concepts about video creation, and tools I
> > will be using
> > Week 2: work on the video/s about packaging (for example, as it is one
> > mentioned on the Oureachy website)
> > Or does it have to be more detailed?
>
> I prefer to see an outline first, not very much detalied, and when the need
> arises some parts can be refined. When there is a timeline, it is good to see
> what the time estimates are based on. One way to do that is to break down
> a task, as time requirements of smaller tasks are easier to estimate, but
> there are other ways. So I don't think we need a much more detailed timeline
> initially, but it would be nice if you could point out what your time
> estimates
> are based on. If anyone is confused about a point in the outline, or would
> like
> to see more details, then that can be refined. WDYT?
I think that is OK, I am answering the mail with the discussion about
the videos to see how to go on with my timeline, since it is my first
proposal and I guess it will have to be modified. For example, there
are some details about how to group tasks according to which videos
are needed. But I will come up with an initial version at least to
know if i am on the right track.
>
>
> > Regards!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ricardo
> > Laura
>
> Best regards,
> g_bor
Regards!
Laura
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, (continued)
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Laura Lazzati, 2018/10/25
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/10/26
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Laura Lazzati, 2018/10/26
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/26
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Laura Lazzati, 2018/10/26
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/26
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Laura Lazzati, 2018/10/26
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/10/26
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Laura Lazzati, 2018/10/27
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/28
- Re: [outreachy] Further steps,
Laura Lazzati <=