guix-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

02/05: website: guixdays-arm-hacking: Use ellipses.


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: 02/05: website: guixdays-arm-hacking: Use ellipses.
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:03:10 -0500 (EST)

civodul pushed a commit to branch master
in repository guix-artwork.

commit 23919691f1788ac0e34eba51dfac30358693fae3
Author: Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
Date:   Thu Feb 7 09:24:36 2019 +0100

    website: guixdays-arm-hacking: Use ellipses.
    
    * website/posts/guixdays-arm-hacking.md: Use HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS rather
    than three or two dots.
---
 website/posts/guixdays-arm-hacking.md | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/website/posts/guixdays-arm-hacking.md 
b/website/posts/guixdays-arm-hacking.md
index 039ad65..0282379 100644
--- a/website/posts/guixdays-arm-hacking.md
+++ b/website/posts/guixdays-arm-hacking.md
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ $(guix build --source binutils)` and started looking. There 
were many obvious
      `(("gcc:lib" ,gcc "lib")))))
 ```
 
-One more build cycle later and we did it! `/gnu/store/...-binutils-gold-2.31.1`
+One more build cycle later and we did it! `/gnu/store/…-binutils-gold-2.31.1`
 existed! We now did two things, we copied our patch over to an aarch64 build
 machine and we started cleaning up our package definition on our x86_64 build
 machine, where we knew we had a working package definition.
@@ -221,16 +221,16 @@ was added and our build started.
        ,@(package-native-inputs go-1.4)))
 ```
 
-First build, success! `/gnu/store/...-go-1.11.5` exists! OK, but does it
+First build, success! `/gnu/store/…-go-1.11.5` exists! OK, but does it
 actually work? `guix build syncthing --system=armhf-linux`.
-`/gnu/store/...-syncthing-1.0.0` exists too! A quick check of `guix refresh
+`/gnu/store/…-syncthing-1.0.0` exists too! A quick check of `guix refresh
 --list-dependent address@hidden showed that we had unlocked 176 new packages 
for armhf.
 Even better, since they had all failed by default due to address@hidden 
failing to
 build, for each package that did build meant one fewer package which failed to
 build which should take a big bite out of our build failures.
 
-Our next test was syncthing for aarch64. `/gnu/store/...-go-1.11.5` exists!
-`/gnu/store/..-syncthing-1.0.0` ... does not. "`unknown architecture 
'armv7-a'`."
+Our next test was syncthing for aarch64. `/gnu/store/…-go-1.11.5` exists!
+`/gnu/store/…-syncthing-1.0.0` ... does not. "`unknown architecture 
'armv7-a'`."
 It seems that Go is confused which architecture it is building for.
 Unfortunately we were reaching the end of our time for hacking, so that will
 have to wait for another day. All that was left now was the test failures on



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]