[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:24:09 -0800 |
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:17:49 +0000
MJ Ray <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2004-03-23 21:27:53 +0000 Chris B. Vetter <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > http://www.gnustep.org/information/machines_1.html#SEC8 [...]
> > c) Preferred installation would be from CVS, so you need to install
> > dependencies 'by hand' via ports. These are listed below.
> I think the installation method described on gnustep.org ought to be
> actual releases, not CVS stuff. "Update from CVS" is already the
> user-hostile answer to many informal GNUstep bug reports, without that
> encouragement.
I agree. I'm merely stating the fact that FreeBSD's ports of GNUstep are
far from ideal.
My intention of sending the original mail was to fill in on the missing
information WRT to "Extra libs needed".
--
Chris
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, (continued)
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/25
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Adam Fedor, 2004/03/26
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/26
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Adam Fedor, 2004/03/26
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/30
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Adam Fedor, 2004/03/30
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Wim Oudshoorn, 2004/03/23
- Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, MJ Ray, 2004/03/25
Re: Other observations on www.gnustep.org, Chris B. Vetter, 2004/03/23