gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cutting a gnustep-gui release


From: Gürkan Myczko
Subject: Re: Cutting a gnustep-gui release
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:15:29 +0200

will it have the -wayland back? clang? yay !!!!

:) thumbs up

Gürkan
Tel. 076 436 72 00


> On Apr 4, 2017, at 06:03, Eric Heintzmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> ( Debian is currently frozen, so new gnustep packages won't be included
> in Debian 9.
> But of course I will package it in experimental section)
> 
> What I do at each release of gnustep-gui/back:
> 
> 0   install all dev dependencies with apt (gnustep-base-dev & 
> build-essential & all -dev packages needed).
> 
> 1 -  rebuild gnustep-gui/back and see if all GNUstep apps still work
> fine without rebuild them
> 
> 2 - rebuild all GNUstep  apps with the new gnustep-gui/dev, and see if
> they still build fine.
> 
> 3 - repackage the new gnustep-gui/back, and see if debbuild show an
> ABI/API breakage when building.
> (to repackage I just have to copy the debian subdir into your source
> tree checked out from GNUstep's Subversion,
> and run debuild --
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/build.html#debuild).
> 
> 4 - run lintian
> (https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/checkit.html#lintians)
> on the new gui/back packages .
> (I use lintian -i -I -E --show-overrides)
> 
> Thanks
> 
>> Le 04/04/2017 à 02:23, Ivan Vučica a écrit :
>> 
>> It's not totally clear to me how to make a good use of this.
>> 
>> Let's assume I have an existing .deb obtained via packages.debian.org
>> <http://packages.debian.org> (or an .so from that .deb), and I have a
>> source tree checked out from GNUstep's Subversion. Let's assume I have
>> no 'package tree' (i.e. one with debian/ directory) at a particular time.
>> 
>> What would you like me to do to prepare the source tree (do I need to
>> obtain the debian/ directory, for example), and what would you like me
>> to execute in order to validate that the ABI didn't break?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Eric Heintzmann
>> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>    Le 16/12/2016 à 17:16, Ivan Vučica a écrit :
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Eric Heintzmann
>>> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>    <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>
>>    wrote:
>>> 
>>>    Debian Stretch will be fully frozen on 2017-02-05.
>>>    A special release before this date, with all you want to see in
>>>    the next
>>>    debian stable distro, would be a good idea.
>>> 
>>>    (The current status of Stretch is "transition freeze", it means
>>>    that all
>>>    ABI/API breakage will be refused by the official Debian 
>>    release team)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Unless I missed something significant, the API/ABI should be
>>    backwards
>>> compatible. (I'd go through the list of changes before the release.)
>>> 
>>> Any easy way to test whether Debian will consider API/ABI
>>    breakage has
>>> happened, which we could then add to the release docs?
>>> 
>> 
>>    
>> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-updates
>>    
>> <https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-updates>
>> 
>>    
>> https://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#sonameapiabi
>>    
>> <https://www.netfort.gr.jp/%7Edancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#sonameapiabi>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]