[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:23:41 +0100 |
> Well if apple did the work like they should have done. This would not
> be an issue. So I still say blame apple and not support clang for the
> same reason.
In practical terms that stance doesn't exactly lead to us ending up with
a good complier though does it? Clang is a v.good compiler, and is being
maintained. Not supporting it is rather biting off our nose to spite
our face, especially if GCC isn't interested in supporting ObjC anymore.
- Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Vincent Richomme, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, David Chisnall, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Vincent Richomme, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, David Chisnall, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Andrew Pinski, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc,
Pete French <=
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Andrew Pinski, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Gregory Casamento, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Nicola Pero, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Gregory Casamento, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Nicola Pero, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Nicola Pero, 2010/09/13
Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Nicola Pero, 2010/09/13