[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues
From: |
Gregory John Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:10:12 -0700 (PDT) |
Here is the email I sent...
----
Brett,
We're having some issues after the move to LGPLv3. Specifically there are some
applications which are GPLv2 only.
Wouldit be possible to get an exception for GNUstep which would allow this.
Alternatively, would it be possible for GNUstep to be considered a"System
Library" so that the exception for that applies. I amstarting to wonder to
myself if we didn't move too hastily when movingGNUstep to GPL v3 of the
license.
Currently this is being discussed at length on the GNUstep-discusslist which is
hosted by the FSF. Please make any comments you feelrelevant there if you can.
I would like to discuss exceptionsthat we can consider or any other possible
solutions. My cell phoneis (240)274-9630 and my home phone is (301)362-9640.
We might consider the following, if possible:
/* As a special exception, if you link this library with files compiled with
GCC to produce an executable, this does not cause the resulting executable
to be covered by the GNU General Public License. This exception does not
however invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be
covered by the GNU General Public License. */
This was taken from libobjc. Please let me know.
Later, GJC
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer
----- Original Message ----
From: Gregory John Casamento <address@hidden>
To: Hubert Chathi <address@hidden>; address@hidden
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 7:14:57 PM
Subject: Re: GPLv2 licensing issues
All,
I've written Brett Smith at the FSF to ask about exceptions or any possible
solutions to the issues we're discussing. I will post relevant points when he
replies to my email.
Thanks, GJC
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer
----- Original Message ----
From: Hubert Chathi <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 6:42:15 PM
Subject: Re: GPLv2 licensing issues
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:08:52 +0000 (UTC), Yavor Doganov <address@hidden> said:
> Thanks for raising the issue, and the summary. В Thu, 10 Apr 2008
> 13:51:08 -0400, Hubert Chathi написа:
>> or http://price.sourceforge.net/exception.html
> I am not sure that such an exception is sufficient to eliminate the
> incompatibility problem -- in fact, I fear that it may not have a
> legal effect. Riccardo, have you contacted address@hidden about
> this?
What problems do you see with it?
The text is more-or-less copied from the
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LinkingOverControlledInterface
(minus explanatory preamble and postamble).
--
Hubert Chathi - Email/Jabber: address@hidden - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, (continued)
RE: GPLv2 licensing issues, Nicola Pero, 2008/04/10
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Gregory John Casamento, 2008/04/11
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues,
Gregory John Casamento <=