[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
From: |
David Ayers |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:09:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20070113) |
Adam Fedor schrieb:
> Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Dec 3 06:34:10 EST 2007
> If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
> be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
>
> If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see
> http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F
>
> Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 Mon Dec 3 15:36:40 CST 2007
NSDecimalNumber.m: In function `-[NSDecimalNumber initWithBytes:objCType:]':
NSDecimalNumber.m:348: warning: implicit declaration of function `isinff'
...
../Source/./obj/libgnustep-base.so: undefined reference to `isinff'
gmake[2]: *** [obj/autogsdoc] Error 1
gmake[1]: *** [autogsdoc.all.tool.variables] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/home/gstest/gnustep-testfarm/core/base/Tools'
gmake: *** [internal-all] Error 2
Could someone with access to a FreeBSD system check whether I need to
define something special (akin to _GNU_SOURCE) to make isinff() visible,
or let me know of FreeBSD's C-Library simply does not provide isinff?
> Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Mon Dec 3 03:57:12 CET 2007
> Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mon Dec 3 01:23:28 EST 2007
Here it seems that
isnanf
isinf
isinff
are all not visible. There must also be someway to expose the C99 macros.
Cheers,
David