[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration
From: |
Helge Hess |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:59:13 +0200 |
On 23. Okt 2005, at 13:25 Uhr, Markus Hitter wrote:
Unlike CVS, Subversion numbers versions throughout the whole
repository. A bunch of files checked out have always the same
version; files get higher version numbers even without being
changed. As a result, one should tend to make small repositories,
i.e. one for each app, one for each tool, one for each lib.
Exactly. But notable repositories can refer each other so that other
repositories are checked out automagically as subtrees. So the user
doesn't usually need to be concerned about the actual repository a
source comes from.
Greets,
Helge
--
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
OpenGroupware.org
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/22
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Adam Fedor, 2005/10/22
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, David Ayers, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Markus Hitter, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration,
Helge Hess <=
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/22
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Riccardo, 2005/10/24
RE: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Adam Fedor, 2005/10/25