|
From: | MJ Ray |
Subject: | Re: [Gnustep-marketing] GNUstep Foundation |
Date: | Fri, 01 Oct 2004 01:17:22 +0100 |
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, MJ Ray wrote:<address@hidden> wrote:I can... Because it would be managed by people who have little to do > with the actual GNUstep project.Huh? I would expect that to make the Foundation less legitimate in most people's eyes.Well, I disagree, but we're allowed to do that.
It would be more helpful if someone tried to explain why having a "GNUstep Foundation" managed by people who have little to do with the actual project makes it more legitimate.
No, because it's the most logical name. "The <foo> Foundation" is extremely common.Why? Just to ape GNOME?
If it's so clearly logical, why cannot I see it and why has no-one justified it beyond imitating other groups?
I wanted to know whether I can read gnustep-dev as a newsgroup, not why this was cc'd.Gmane carries it.
That's possible. Thank you.I cannot get Gmane groups added to my local newsserver. Why isn't gnustep-dev in gnu.gnustep.*?
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ LinuxExpo.org.uk village 6+7 Oct http://www.affs.org.uk
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |