[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release schedule
From: |
Alexander Malmberg |
Subject: |
Re: Release schedule |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Apr 2003 03:01:40 +0200 |
Nicola Pero wrote:
> > Hmm, how about:
> > ""
> > The primary goal for core/ is to provide an implementation of the
> > FoundationKit and ApplicationKit interfaces of OPENSTEP, which was
> > essentially a superset of the OpenStep specification.
> >
> > OpenStep and OPENSTEP are static today. Apple provides Cocoa, which is
> > based on the same interfaces but has numerous additions and changes. It
> > is not our goal to track these changes.
>
> This sentence directly upsets an important part of our user base,
It isn't the only part of our user base, though.
> who *is*
> expecting us to track these changes.
But, unless I'm misunderstanding this completely, we aren't, and I think
we should be upfront about that:
Adam Fedor wrote:
> What I hope to convey is that we want
> OpenStep/OPENSTEP compatibility, but we also want the flexibility, if
> something in Cocoa is truely a better API, to implement that in
> preference to the OpenStep API.
- Alexander Malmberg
- Re: Release schedule, (continued)
- Re: Release schedule, Adam Fedor, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Nicola Pero, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Nicola Pero, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Tim Harrison, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Nicola Pero, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Nicolas Roard, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule,
Alexander Malmberg <=
- Re: Release schedule, Adam Fedor, 2003/03/31
Re: Release schedule, Adam Fedor, 2003/03/27
Re: Release schedule, Adam Fedor, 2003/03/29
Re: Release schedule, Nicola Pero, 2003/03/31