gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] accept null selector for respondsTo...


From: Pete French
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accept null selector for respondsTo...
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:39:38 +0000

> Actually I consider #ifdefs to be very bad in this case, because you 
> come up with different behavior in the binaries.  This will be very hard 
> to handle for RPM's and other packaging methods.  You would have to 

Puzzled by this. I was just thinking of an #ifdef OSX type thing - all
the GNustep birnaries should work the same way, I think we all want
that.

[snip]
>
> Is this clearer now?

The snipped bit is, though the comment about RPM's isnt. Why would you
be using RPM's on OSX (or indeed on anything other than Linux), or
have I missed the point in a spectacular way?

I generally code from GNUstep and where OSX requires different code
stick it in an #ifdef. Its worked so far very nicely...

-bat.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]