[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] gnunet-gtk weirdness and gnunet-setup segfault
From: |
Nils Gillmann |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] gnunet-gtk weirdness and gnunet-setup segfault |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:31:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> writes:
> On 01/17/2016 05:28 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just built gnunet-gtk 0.10.1 with GNU Guix and noticed some problems.
>>
>> When running "gnunet-gtk" all I see is five big icons that I can click,
>> but nothing else. There seems to be something missing.
>
> Hmm. 'gnunet-gtk' tries to internally start gnunet-fs-gtk,
> gnunet-peerinfo-gtk, gnunet-statistics-gtk and other processes. If those
> are somehow not installed/found, that would explain why 'gnunet-gtk'
> looks as it does for you.
>
> So first thing to check is to see if those are built/installed properly
> (they should all also run standalone).
>
>> “gnunet-setup” segfaults when I switch tabs after first clicking on the
>> empty URL dropdown in the “General” tab.
>
> Hmm. That shouldn't be empty in the first place, but this is also a
> rather ancient (2 yo) version. I thought Andreas had packaged a much
> more recent SVN version for GNU Guix. We have not had an URL dropdown in
> the "General" tab for a while now...
>
> Oh, wait. Maybe gnunet-gtk 0.10.1 was packaged against GNUnet (main)
> from SVN HEAD? That could cause all kinds of new and
> interesting fun.
Are you refering to the tarball 0.10.1 of gnunet and gnunet-gtk
or are you refering to the package used on Guix's side? I try to
dig into the buggy package I delivered with gnunet-gtk, and what
I see is that gnunet-0.10.1 is used as well as the 0.10.1 I
packaged for gnunet-gtk.
For testing purposes I need gnunet lastest svn checkout anyhow,
so a more recent version of gnunet will folow.
>> These are the only
>> gnunet-related executables I have run so far. I have not configured
>> anything else.
>>
>> I passed these configure flags:
>>
>> "--without-libunique", "--with-qrencode"
>>
>> At build time the following packages are available:
>>
>> gnunet 0.10.1
>> libgcrypt 1.6.3
>> gtk+ 3.18.2
>> libextractor 1.3
>> glade 3.18.3
>> libglade 2.6.4
>> qrencode 3.4.3
>> pkg-config 0.28
>>
>> I’m afraid I cannot provide debug information at the moment.
>From my previous packaging at gentoo, I have some more flags to
pass to gnunet-gtk, fingers crossed to get this thing going and
if still failing I can provide more debug info.
> Sure, no need. 0.10.1 is old. But the real question is what the
> specific repository version is?
>
> What do you get for
>
> $ gnunet-arm -v
gnunet-arm v0.10.1 release
> vs.
>
> $ gnunet-gtk -v
I just installed gnunet-gtk:
gnunet-gtk v0.10.1 release
> Ideally, they should show the same number (i.e. I get
> gnunet-arm v0.10.1 svn-r36683M and gnunet-gtk v0.10.1 svn-r36683M).
So, yes they are. The issue might be at some other point I tried
to point out in another email I send.
> I hope this helps a bit!
>
> Christian
thanks,
--
ng
irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/~NiAsterisk
https://psyced.org:34443/NiAsterisk/
EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/Echt_Dezentrales_Netz/en
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] gnunet-gtk weirdness and gnunet-setup segfault,
Nils Gillmann <=