[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:43:51 -0500 |
when you build a program to work on an directory, all that you will need
from that package is the binary location.
I do not understand any of that. I think you need to give labels
to the various entities that you are talking about, and describe their
relationships clearly.
What you will need is, instead stowfs, that get package/bin and merge it on
/bin, is a translator that gets package/bin and put it on PATH. The same is
valid for /lib and /sbin (I know no variable to set "include" directories).
That is very vague, so I don't see how it differs from our present
plans.
- Re: No to StowFS!, (continued)
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/02/03
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/07
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/08
- Re: No to StowFS!, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/09
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/06
Re: No to StowFS!,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: No to StowFS!, Michael Heath, 2006/02/04
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Leonardo Pereira, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/02/08
Re: No to StowFS!, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/02/09