[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Parabola packaging
From: |
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Parabola packaging |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2023 06:26:06 +0200 |
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 22:26:26 -0400
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
> > I've argued in another mail why having the choice between
> > "removing the package" or "following that kind of rules rules"
> > would in fact make it more simple for distributions.
>
> This makes no sense to me, because I don't see that either of those
> two has any advantage for distro maintainers.
>
> What I'm planning to do, since it gives flexibility to distro
> maintainers, is clearly preferable to distro maintainers over
> either of those two options.
Here I was talking about the advise you plan to give.
Here I am simply suggesting that advising to "remove the package" is
fine as long as it is also clear that following the kind of rules I
suggested would be equivalent (so it could be added in the advise as
well, in context near the advise, etc).
> Why spend more time discussing this?
Because it has consequences on the well being of FSDG distributions,
their contributors, and their users.
Denis.
pgpwqyO07azxN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Parabola packaging, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/07/09
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Parabola packaging, bill-auger, 2023/07/31