[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
predictable behavior and optimization setting, was: +-Inf and NaN
From: |
Robert Dodier |
Subject: |
predictable behavior and optimization setting, was: +-Inf and NaN |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:09:47 -0800 |
Camm, thanks for taking the time to write about this stuff. I'm more
broadly interested in all of it, but in the interest of brevity I'll
just make a quick note.
It sounds like part of the proposal is to let program behavior change
with the compiler optimization setting. I'm pretty uncomfortable with
that -- it would make it pretty hard to predict what some code is
going to do. There's no guarantee that the optimization flag is the
same one time as another, so one can't know whether the program will
behave the same.
I'll let that be enough for now and try to address some of the other
stuff later.
best
Robert
- +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/20
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/20
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/21
- predictable behavior and optimization setting, was: +-Inf and NaN,
Robert Dodier <=
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/21
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/22
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/26
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/26
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/28
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/28
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/28