[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:42:24 +0100 (CET) |
> Then I loaded the character 'f'(shorter than the pipe symbol)
> expecting to get a bitmap with fewer rows, instead I got a bitmap
> with a larger number of rows.
It's not clear to me whether you simply get a larger bitmap (i.e.,
more rows), or whether the glyph itself (this is, the rendered black
pixels) is larger...
In case you haven't solved the problem yet please provide a
standalone, *small* demo program for the terminal that exhibits the
issue.
Werner
- [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/18
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/22
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/22
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/22
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/22
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/22