[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] FT_Pos clarification (Typo?)
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] FT_Pos clarification (Typo?) |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:22:55 +0100 (CET) |
> I'm wondering if there's a typo in the FT_Pos docs, at:
> http://freetype.sourceforge.net/freetype2/docs/reference/ft2-basic_types.html#FT_Pos
>
> It's described as a *32-bit* integer, but is typedef'd to be a *long*.
> On LP64 systems (Like x64 Linux), a long is actually *64* bits - See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LP64#Specific_data_models
It's a typo, or rather, it stems from the time where nobody took care
of 64bit systems. Thanks for spotting; I've fixed it in the git.
Werner
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [ft] FT_Pos clarification (Typo?),
Werner LEMBERG <=