RE: [ft] Type 1 PFM read problem.

[George Williams]

On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 20:40, Rajeev Pahuja wrote:
> Thanks for reply.
> 
> I have seen this document before. 
> The doubt arose as it's title say "Building PFM files for Postscript
> Language CJK Fonts". 
> 
> Is this for "CJK Fonts" ?? or for all ??
The version number for non CJK fonts is also 0x100. MS used to have a
pfm spec on the web, but they removed it a few years ago.

Perhaps version 0x200 is for ntf files (which supposedly replaced pfm
files around windows 2000). I've never seen a spec for ntf files.