[elpa] externals/eglot 973cd81 25/26: Close #180: Add preamble to comparison to lsp-mode.el

[João Távora]

branch: externals/eglot
commit 973cd8130b92b0c50c50763469be135fc5724cd4
Author: João Távora <address@hidden>
Commit: João Távora <address@hidden>

    Close #180: Add preamble to comparison to lsp-mode.el
    
    * README.md (Differences to lsp-mode.el): Add preamble.
---
 README.md | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index ad6730c..cefccad 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -237,17 +237,18 @@ eglot-shutdown`.
 
 # Differences to lsp-mode.el
 
-Eglot and [lsp-mode.el][emacs-lsp] share a common goal, which is to
-bring LSP to Emacs.  lsp-mode.el is a more mature extension with a
-host of [plugins][emacs-lsp-plugins] for bells and whistles.  Eglot
-may still lag it in some aspects, but the gap is closing as more
-features make it into Eglot and more servers are supported
-out-of-the-box.
-
-Conversely, you may find Eglot surpasses lsp-mode.el in other aspects,
-namely simplicity.  Eglot is considerably less code and hassle than
-lsp-mode.el.  In most cases, there's nothing to configure.  It's a
-minimalist approach focused on user experience and performance.
+Around May 2018, I wrote a comparison of Eglot to `lsp-mode.el`, and
+was discussed with its then-maintainer.  That mode has since been
+refactored/rewritten and now
+[purports to support](https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/issues/180)
+a lot of features that differentiated Eglot from it.  It may now be
+very different or very similar to Eglot, or even sing with the birds
+in the trees, so [go check it out](emacs-lsp).  That said, here's the
+original comparison, which I will not be updating any more.
+
+Eglot is considerably less code and hassle than lsp-mode.el.  In most
+cases, there's nothing to configure.  It's a minimalist approach
+focused on user experience and performance.
 
 User-visible differences: