emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#34490: closed (console the user that his -n in sor


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#34490: closed (console the user that his -n in sort --debug -n was seen)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 03:12:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:11:51 -0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#34490: console the user that his -n in sort --debug -n 
was seen
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34490,
regarding console the user that his -n in sort --debug -n was seen
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
34490: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34490
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: console the user that his -n in sort --debug -n was seen Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:21:37 +0800
Can you please have assure the user in that message it makes
that it has indeed seen his -n/--numeric-sort.

$ sort --debug
sort: using simple byte comparison
$ sort --debug --numeric-sort
sort: using simple byte comparison
                   ^^^^ unchanged. User gets nervous.

sort (GNU coreutils) 8.30. Sorry we discussed this before but kinda hard to 
find...



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#34490: console the user that his -n in sort --debug -n was seen Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:11:51 -0800 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 16/02/19 23:28, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>>>>>> "PB" == Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> writes:
> PB> Fair point. I'm thinking of this extra qualification:
> 
> PB>   sort: text ordering performed using ‘en_IE.UTF-8’ sorting rules
> Maybe say                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^'LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8' 
> sorting rules
> 
> PB>   sort: text ordering performed using simple byte comparison
> 
> sort: text ordering performed using simple byte (LC_CTYPE=C) comparison
> or something like that.

That's probably more confusing to the user,
especially as one doesn't generally explicitly set LC_CTYPE.
I'll go with my clarification.

thanks,
Pádraig



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]