emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#29810: closed (gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#29810: closed (gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by openblas on some)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:22:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:21:48 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#29810] gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by 
openblas on some
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #29810,
regarding gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by openblas on some
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
29810: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29810
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by openblas on some Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:13:29 +0000 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
This addresses a potential performance problem, fixed in the post-0.2.20
source.  It's intended for application to a package definition updated
to 0.2.20, which Ludo said is in the pipeline.  Apologies that I don't
seem to have converged on an acceptable style for changes.

Attachment: 0001-gnu-maths-Fix-cache-size-detected-by-openblas-on-som.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#29810] gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by openblas on some Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:21:48 -0500 User-agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07)
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:43:45AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Thanks for the patch.  Given the number of dependents, we would not push
> it in master (info "(guix) Submitting Patches").  At the same time,
> since 0.2.20 is in core-updates and well on its way, do you think we
> should keep those patches?
> 
> Perhaps in core-updates we could keep both 0.2.19 with these patches and
> 0.2.20 (ISTR you said there were incompatibilities between these two
> versions)?  Would it make sense?

Our openblas package is currently at version 0.3.4. Due to lack of
response from the submitter and the "staleness" of these patches I'm
closing the bug ticket. Please re-open the bug if it is still relevant
to you.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]