[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Dvdrtools-users] Re: New page: DVD Standards Comparison by DriveGene
From: |
Bryan J. Smith |
Subject: |
[Dvdrtools-users] Re: New page: DVD Standards Comparison by DriveGeneration |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:23:41 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.7 |
Quoting Andy Polyakov <address@hidden>:
>
> ^^^^??? ProDVD never could record DVD+, correction should be applied
> to *all* generations.
Correct. I've noted no compatibility, except for DVD-R(G) on the Sony.
> > So, DVD+RW supports both CLV and CAV,
> ^^^^ when it comes to DVD+ recording, CLV is the
> only option. Playback is CAV, but then it's rated higher than 2.4x and
> even 4x. If you want to discuss playback, you probably should
> introduce separate line.
Correct. I've limited CAV discussion to improved read performance.
> I can see you've updated even "Record(GPL)" line adding "CDR2+patch."
> dvd+rw-tools are licensed under GPL and support DVD+RW, DVD+R
> (verified to work with wide range of DVD+ units), as well as DVD-R
> and DVD-RW recordings (verified with SONY and Pioneer units).
> And in a sense it (growisofs) support even DVD-RAM recording, at
> least it's possible to seamlessly grow ISO9660 volumes directly on
> DVD-RAM media:-)
Okay, I guess I need to figure out how the DVD+RW tools work. I assumed they
were a set of kernel patches to added rewrite support with any Linux supported
filesystem (like DVD-RAM), but I assumed wrong? Are they simply a set of
programs that allow user-space access to the device?
Thanx for all your time in educating me.
--
Bryan J. Smith (suffix-free title for your protection)
mailto:address@hidden http://www.thebs.org
-------------------------------------------------------
A public "commons" is quite beneficial to Captialism
But it mutates into "Communism" upon government mandate