[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pnet-developers] Re: [DotGNU]FW: vs project
From: |
Russell Stuart |
Subject: |
[Pnet-developers] Re: [DotGNU]FW: vs project |
Date: |
24 Jul 2004 14:32:03 +1000 |
As far as I can tell, most highly successful open source
admins have very clear ideas on the direction a project
can head. And they aren't afraid of saying so.
http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2002/Apr/2853.html
On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 08:21, Neil Cawse wrote:
> It's a real pity you can't compromise; you might get more out of
> people...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rhys Weatherley [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 6:07 PM
> > To: Neil Cawse
> > Subject: Re: vs project
> >
> > On Saturday 24 July 2004 04:09 am, Neil Cawse wrote:
> >
> > > Would that be ok - just for now?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > The tool for generating csproj files can be updated to generate
> MSBuild
> > files
> > in the future. Most of the csant-reading and processing code would be
> > identical, with only a small amount of code specific to the output
> format.
> >
> > I will not allow the CVS tree to be polluted in this way. What's
> next?
> > Someone demands that we include NAnt files so that they can build with
> > Mono
> > without installing csant first? Or manual Makefile's for Rotor, which
> > doesn't have any kind of build tool? Where does it end?
> >
> > It is tool, or nothing. The decision has been made.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Rhys.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Pnet-developers] Re: [DotGNU]FW: vs project,
Russell Stuart <=