|
From: | David Sugar |
Subject: | Re: [DotGNU]Potentially useful kit |
Date: | Mon, 07 Jan 2002 14:41:38 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914 |
Excplicit disjunctive licenses are often used when trying to license something that must be linked with things that have incompatible licenses. For example, perl's artistic license and the GPL are mutually non-interchangable since each have clauses that interfere with the other. A disjunctive license allows one to publically license a work so that others could choose which license to apply as they make use of the work. Again, this does not interfere with your implicit right to seperately license the same work to others under yet different terms.
Chris Smith wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2002 17:10, Bill Lance wrote:Chris, I've read thru your white papaer and other material. Very interesting. Is all of that GPL'ed?Not currently.I own the license as it's all 100% my work spanning (on and off) the last 5 years or so.TBH, I'm not much for nailing down ownership, but whatever happens with the licensing I don't want to stop myself from being able to using the components with my clients (libraries, servers and all that).Anyway, GPL'ing / Dual licensing, whaterver.... not a problem (which is what you want to hear really!)Regards, Chris _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list address@hidden http://subscribe.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |