[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wildlife Tracker (again)
From: |
Fons Adriaensen |
Subject: |
Re: Wildlife Tracker (again) |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Nov 2023 21:33:11 +0100 |
Hi Al,
(Please reply to the list)
> The Rpi could be in the field for months - haven't decided yet if I
> will set up remote access, so let's assume for now it's offline and
> whatever I save will be to locally attached storage.
Even if you store the signal amplitude at 200 Hz, 1 byte per sample
(convert to dB before), that would take just 17.3 MByte per day.
Peanuts even for an Rpi.
You could run the post-processing code each hour, each day, or each
hour reducing the data rate to a trivial value. It all depends on
how 'real-time' you want the monitoring to be.
As Jeff Long pointed out, the advantage of having the post-processing
separate from the DSP code is that you can modify or extend it without
having to touch Gnuradio code once that works as desired.
Ciao,
--
FA