discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: double free or corruption error when two instances of an OOT block u


From: Grace Yeung
Subject: Re: double free or corruption error when two instances of an OOT block using fftw is called in GRC
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 09:05:42 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0

Thank you Marcus for taking the time to look through the backtrace error. ApplyFilterBank simply calls ForwardFT to perform the FFT and does not access the plan. It only uses the FFT output. I had to destroy the plan each time because I noticed memory was consistently growing when gnuradio was running the flowgraph. After adding the destroy_plan memory stops growing. Hope this makes sense. Thank you.

Grace



On 4/21/23 07:11, Marcus Müller wrote:
Hi Grace,

reading this backtrace, the error happens in

#29 0x00007fffe99b04d5 in gr::customModule::probeExtract_impl::ApplyFilterBank

So, that's where you need to look, not sure whether the other code you shared helps.

But reading your other code: you seem to be making an FFT plan and destroying it *every single time you do an FFT*. That's a terrible idea – planning an FFT typically takes much longer than doing an FFT, even a really badly implemented one. You also make a local array of plans, just to put that single plan in, then destroy it. This indicates you've got a logical bug in your thinking about C++ scoping and lifetimes. If I had to take a wild guess, you're trying to access a plan that does no longer exist in your ApplyFilterBank.

Best regards,
Marcus

On 19.04.23 20:18, Grace Yeung wrote:
After some debugging, it appears grc is breaking inside of calls to fftw (see below). I am simply trying to use fftw to perform a simple FFT transform (forward/backward). Is there anything special I need to watch out for when using fftw with gnuradio? Any examples available? Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks!

Backtracing shows the crash happens in an fftw3f library function used in the code...

(gdb) bt
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
#1 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/1>0x00007ffff7dd1859 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 #2 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/2>0x00007ffff7e3c26e in __libc_message (action=action@entry=do_abort, fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff7f66298 "%s\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:155 #3 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/3>0x00007ffff7e442fc in malloc_printerr (str=str@entry=0x7ffff7f68628 "double free or corruption (fasttop)") at malloc.c:5347 #4 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/4>0x00007ffff7e45c65 in _int_free (av=0x7fffac000020, p=0x7fffac55a8d0, have_lock=0) at malloc.c:4266 #5 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/5>0x00007fffefe830d9 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #6 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/6>0x00007fffefe83c44 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #7 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/7>0x00007fffefe83fc4 in fftwf_mkplan_d () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #8 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/8>0x00007fffefe88e5d in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #9 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/9>0x00007fffefe8380b in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #10 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/10>0x00007fffefe83a03 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #11 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/11>0x00007fffefe83fc4 in fftwf_mkplan_d () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #12 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/12>0x00007fffefe8d95c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #13 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/13>0x00007fffefe8380b in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #14 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/14>0x00007fffefe83a03 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #15 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/15>0x00007fffefe83fc4 in fftwf_mkplan_d () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #16 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/16>0x00007fffefe84043 in fftwf_mkplan_f_d () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #17 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/17>0x00007fffefe887a3 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #18 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/18>0x00007fffefe8380b in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #19 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/19>0x00007fffefe83a03 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #20 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/20>0x00007fffefe83fc4 in fftwf_mkplan_d () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #21 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/21>0x00007fffefe88e5d in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #22 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/22>0x00007fffefe8380b in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #23 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/23>0x00007fffefe83a03 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #24 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/24>0x00007fffeff4a583 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #25 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/25>0x00007fffeff4a758 in fftwf_mkapiplan () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #26 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/26>0x00007fffeff4ddd7 in fftwf_plan_many_dft () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #27 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/27>0x00007fffeff4d09b in fftwf_plan_dft () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #28 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/28>0x00007fffeff4cd9a in fftwf_plan_dft_1d () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3 #29 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/29>0x00007fffe99b04d5 in gr::customModule::probeExtract_impl::ApplyFilterBank(int, gr::customModule::probeExtract_impl::FilterBank, std::vector<std::complex, std::allocator<std::complex > >&, int, int, int, std::vector<float, std::allocator >&, int, int, int) () from /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnuradio-customModule.so.1.0.0git #30 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/30>0x00007fffe99b1f69 in gr::customModule::probeExtract_impl::general_work(int, std::vector<int, std::allocator >&, std::vector<void const*, std::allocator<void const*> >&, std::vector<void*, std::allocator<void*> >&) () from /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnuradio-customModule.so.1.0.0git #31 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/31>0x00007ffff0799c03 in gr::block_executor::run_one_iteration() () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.8.1 #32 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/32>0x00007ffff07ed59a in gr::tpb_thread_body::tpb_thread_body(boost::shared_ptrgr::block, boost::shared_ptrboost::barrier, int) ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.8.1
#33 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/33>0x00007ffff07dd818 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.8.1 #34 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/34>0x00007ffff07fc4e8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.8.1 #35 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/35>0x00007ffff010343b in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_thread.so.1.71.0 #36 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/36>0x00007ffff7d94609 in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:477 #37 <https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/pull/37>0x00007ffff7ece133 in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95




On 2/15/23 13:01, Grace Yeung wrote:
Hi, I have a gnuradio out-of-tree block written in C++ that runs fine in grc 3.8.1.0. But when I have two of them running simultaneously in the flowgraph, grc crashes and gives me the error:

double free or corruption (!prev)

I am not using any free() functions. I use std::vector's in my code which should handle dynamic memory allocation automatically. What could be causing this error?

The only other place I see in the code that deals with pointers is the calling of "new" in the definition of the make function which returns an sptr:
      probeExtract::sptr
      probeExtract::make(const char* filtName, const char* maskName, int mlsrM, int numChan, int sampPerBit, int Tblock, int edgeBufferSize, int structureType)
      {
          return gnuradio::get_initial_sptr
          (new probeExtract_impl(filtName, maskName, mlsrM, numChan, sampPerBit, Tblock, edgeBufferSize, structureType));
      }
I suppose I do not need to worry about free'ing the pointer which is handled internally by python?

After putting in some debugging statements, I see variations of similar error such as:
corrupted size vs. prev_size while consolidating

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Grace


--
Grace K. Yeung, MS
NorthWest Research Associates
301 Webster Street
Monterey, CA 93940
grace@nwra.com
https://www.nwra.com



--
Grace K. Yeung, MS
NorthWest Research Associates
301 Webster Street
Monterey, CA 93940
grace@nwra.com
https://www.nwra.com

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]