Oops, sorry. Wasn’t thinking about the whole application. I guess it would be impossible to do sample accurate control remotely since you’d have RPC propagation delay. You could however still switch the selector at runtime based on a counter though.
<end transmission> On May 5, 2022, at 11:51, Marcin Puchlik <m.puchlik@is-wireless.com> wrote:
Hi Paul, But there is a requirement that switching has to be done after N samples, how to control that from the external app? You can also use a selector block and switch the input at runtime from a separate application if you don’t want to incur the downtime of locking, reconfiguring and unlocking. <end transmission> On May 5, 2022, at 06:11, Marcin Puchlik via GNU Radio, the Free & Open-Source Toolkit for Software Radio <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> wrote:
Hello, To WarMonkey: I know how to make OOT and it seems that you don't understand my question. To Gregory: That's a brilliant idea. I just need a counter and based on that just switch the branch in my flowgraph. I am going to try this. Thanks! How about configuring two parallel data flows, with a switch that diverts from one to the other after N samples? — Gregory R. Warnes, Ph.D. (Sent from a mobile device, please excuse any typographical issues.) On May 4, 2022, at 11:32 AM, Marcin Puchlik via GNU Radio, the Free & Open-Source Toolkit for Software Radio <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> wrote:
Hello, As far as I know, the "Head" block finishes the operation of a flowgraph which I don't want to do. What OOT has to do? Any details?
use "Head" N samples, or create your own OOT module.
Marcin Puchlik via GNU Radio, the Free & Open-Source Toolkit for Software Radio < discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> 于2022年5月4日周三 22:11写道: Hello Everyone, Instead of using sleep(0.1) I want my flowgraph to lock after consumption of N samples. Then I want to rearrange the flowgraph blocks. Do you have any idea how to do this? My guess is that I can use Performance Counters like nproduced for the first block in my flowgraph and base on that, call lock() function on my top_block(). What do you think? Cheers
|