[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [USRP-users] about the tunnel.py
From: |
CHAO DONG |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [USRP-users] about the tunnel.py |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:07:52 +0800 |
Josh, thanks.
Now, when i ping B from A, A can receive some ARP requests but ok=false, so A Will not send ARP reply. With the same setting, i use the benchmark, A can receive almost all the packets from B and ok=true.
I think there must be some difference between benchmark and tunnel.
Who can explain this,?
在 2012-7-12 下午4:57,"Josh Blum" <
address@hidden>写道:
On 07/11/2012 08:57 PM, CHAO DONG wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am testing tunnel.py in the narrowband folder, the
> configuration is as follows:
> OS: ubuntu 11.10
> Gnuradio: latest
> UHD:latest
> USRP 1
> RFX400
>
> I set up two machines and do following the readme step by step.
> When i ping machine B from A, A shows it has sent the ARP request, but
> no ARP reply received.
> In fact, B did not receive the ARP request at all.
>
> I use benchmark_rx and benchmark_tx to test the channel, it is ok.
>
> And when i use: sudo ifconfig gr0 192.168.200.1 on A, B can receive
> the IGMP packet from the gr0 of A. This show the gr0 on A and B is ok
> for IGMP protocol.
>
> Welcome any comments!
>
I recall a similar discussion, and one simple solution was to use a
different frequency for each communication channel.
So for communication between A -> B use frequencyX
and for communication B -> A use frequencyY.
I hope that helps!
-josh