[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR)
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR) |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:49:09 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 10:56:00AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> If I get bored (not likely), I would like to try isosynchronous
> transfers over USB. My thinking is a dropped packet is no worse than a
> burst of interference. For radio links, the higher level protocols are
> already handling error detection and correction.
The maximum throughput possible with isochronous packets is really
low.
Eric
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), (continued)
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), Stephane Fillod, 2005/06/22
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), David Young, 2005/06/22
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), Eric Blossom, 2005/06/23
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), Harald Welte, 2005/06/24
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), Eric Blossom, 2005/06/24
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), David Carr, 2005/06/24
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), Philip Balister, 2005/06/24
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), John Gilmore, 2005/06/24
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), Lamar Owen, 2005/06/25
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), Marcus D. Leech, 2005/06/25
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR),
Eric Blossom <=
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), Eric Blossom, 2005/06/26
- [Discuss-gnuradio] FIR filter in fsk_tx.py, Sachi, 2005/06/26
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FIR filter in fsk_tx.py, Sachi, 2005/06/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FIR filter in fsk_tx.py, Matt Ettus, 2005/06/29
- Re: GigE (was Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DSP based SDR), Stephane Fillod, 2005/06/24