[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc
From: |
Brian Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc |
Date: |
06 Feb 2003 19:59:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
"Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <address@hidden> writes:
> > > I'm planning a GCJ based java wrapper for libxml2 (gnome's xml
> > > handling library). The main reason for this is that we don't have an
> > > XSLT processor right now in GNU.
> >
> > I would probably recommend Xalan,
> > http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/index.html, for pure Java action, unless
> > or until there is something similar from the GNU project. I'm not
> > really sure there needs to be one either.
>
> IANAL but xalan is under Apache license which is in turn incompatible
> with GPL. That would be a problem for example when using GPL JVMs
> or linking w/ gjdoc (sun.javadoc) code which is also GPL.
>
> I may be wrong, but thought you should be warned.
Hmm... it's compatible with GNU Classpath and GCJ, (Guile licensing).
Interesting point regarding JVM licensing and tools licensing.
Brian
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/05
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Brian Jones, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Grzegorz B. Prokopski, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Brian Jones, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc,
Brian Jones <=
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Grzegorz B. Prokopski, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc, Brian Jones, 2003/02/07