cp-tools-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Cp-tools Standards


From: nferrier
Subject: Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Cp-tools Standards
Date: 16 Jan 2003 15:57:15 +0000

Julian Scheid <address@hidden> writes:

> No, I didn't know that. Can you point me to the tools
> and their documentation? A google search returns a lot
> of hits for xml+texinfo, but I'm not sure what exactly
> you are referring to. Are you speaking of docbook2x?

No, there's an xml output supported by makeinfo.

I'm not aware of a web page or any other documentation, but if you do:

   makeinfo --xml

you get an xml document.


> In case you already looked at this model, can you say
> if it supports table-like constructs? Problem is, if
> you have a Javadoc comment containing HTML table code,
> it would be nice to have this translated to Info
> properly (i.e. producing a nicely formatted table in
> the Info output.) As you cannot achieve this using
> XSLT (no ASCII layout support), the xml->info processor
> would need to care about this translation. Same goes
> for <ul>/<li> tags, <pre> tags etc.

I'm affraid I don't know... It's just on my wish list /8->



Nic





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]