cp-tools-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Cp-tools Standards


From: Julian Scheid
Subject: Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Cp-tools Standards
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:30:43 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126

No, I didn't know that. Can you point me to the tools
and their documentation? A google search returns a lot
of hits for xml+texinfo, but I'm not sure what exactly
you are referring to. Are you speaking of docbook2x?

In case you already looked at this model, can you say
if it supports table-like constructs? Problem is, if
you have a Javadoc comment containing HTML table code,
it would be nice to have this translated to Info
properly (i.e. producing a nicely formatted table in
the Info output.) As you cannot achieve this using
XSLT (no ASCII layout support), the xml->info processor
would need to care about this translation. Same goes
for <ul>/<li> tags, <pre> tags etc.

Julian

address@hidden wrote:
Are you aware of the existing xml support in info? There is an
xml/info document model. I have been thinking about doing a transform
from gjdoc xml to info xml using xslt.


Nic









reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]