Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] Re: gjdoc

[Brian Jones]

Julian Scheid <address@hidden> writes:

> I have a bunch of fixes and enhancements lying around for a
> couple of weeks that I should have checked in one-by-one over
> time but haven't, sorry for that. They should fix Mark's
> problems and a couple of other issues as well, like the
> occasionally missing last character in a comment.
>
> They also bring support for the ErrorReporter interface and
> an experimental java->xml->info translator that one day may
> make TexiDoclet obsolete. Also some performance improvements,
> and some minor corrections to the documentation.

Cool.

> All in all, this is probably a major update. If noone
> intervenes, I will proceed as follows during the coming days:
> tag the current CVS status for gjdoc as "0.02", so that the
> current version can be retrieved comfortably in case anything
> goes wrong; and check in my local sources.
> 
> Note that my local version has been tested today to produce the
> full docs for the latest CVS release of Classpath, and the command
> line interface didn't change -  so there should be no problem
> switching to this new version for the person caring about the
> generated API documentation.
> 
> Pardon me for violating the golden rule. Nevertheless this
> update will hopefully prove useful.

Not sure what rule you're talking about.  I was afraid no one was
looking after gjdoc and I'm glad I was wrong.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <address@hidden>