[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement
From: |
Eric Noulard |
Subject: |
Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:33:09 +0100 |
2010/11/26 Michael Raab <address@hidden>:
> Hi all,
>
> I think there's no problem with the tick management. Sorry for all the
> confusion.
> The problem was when RAV was delivered during tick() to our observer
> federate, we produced a very nasty exception, that was unfortunately catched
> by __tick_kernel(). This caused the library to block.
Good to know :-]
May be we can avoid to catch user raised exception we may not be
supposed to catch?
However, we shouldn't be catching exception beside the RTI::XXXX ones.
Did you find a place were we catch something else
(if yes please tell us where)
or did your code raise RTI::XXX exceptions ?
> Thanks for all your efforts & Best regards,
The best problems are those which disappear after some time :-]
--
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, (continued)
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/19
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/21
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/26
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement,
Eric Noulard <=
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/26
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/26
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/18