RE: [certi-dev] RE: CERTI - HLA1516.1 C++ headers - Differs from IEEEspecification

[Gotthard, Petr]

Hi Jeroen,
I have one question before the discussion starts ;-) Do you need a full
IEEE 1516 implementation, or just a subset of HLA services? (HLA
services are listed e.g. at
http://www.nongnu.org/certi/PyHLA/manual/node8.html.) What HLA services
are for you "high priority" and what could be "low or no priority" (if
any)?

Regards
Petr

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On
Behalf Of Ijperen, Jeroen van
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 12:07 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [certi-dev] RE: CERTI - HLA1516.1 C++ headers - Differs from
IEEEspecification

Hello,

Our company does development on a simulator currently working with the
IEEE 1516 interface, but we are considering switching to CERTI as our
RTI. Obviously, we would like to keep our HLA 1516 interface intact. Our
first step right now is making an estimate how much work would actually
be required for this. 

Eric informed me that CERTI currently only has the SISO HLA 1516
headers, but no actual implementation. He also indicated that any help
with implementing this was most welcome. 

I was wondering if you could give your estimate on how much work it
would actually be to implement the 1516 interface for CERTI. Is this
something that someone with only basic HLA knowledge would be able to
do? Furthermore, are they also other parties interested in working on
this task?

Also, how would you broadly envision such an implementation? I assume
you want to remain compatible with the 1.3 version of HLA. Would you
move the current implementated functionality to the 1516 sources,
letting the 1.3 version use a subset of 1516 functions?

Kind regards,

Jeroen van IJperen
TASK24

-- 
CERTI-Devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/certi-devel