[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [certi-dev] Solaris10/SunStudio
From: |
Eric Noulard |
Subject: |
Re: [certi-dev] Solaris10/SunStudio |
Date: |
Wed, 20 May 2009 09:20:03 +0200 |
Le 19 mai 2009 23:31, Benoît Bréholée <address@hidden> a écrit :
> Eric Noulard wrote:
>>
>> In the meantime, would you mind trying to replace:
>> // broadcastSomeMessage needs a vector, no set -> conversion
>> vector<FederateHandle>
>> federate_vector(federate_set.begin(),federate_set.end());
>>
>> by:
>> // broadcastSomeMessage needs a vector, no set -> conversion
>> vector<FederateHandle> federate_vector(federate_set.size());
>>
>> std::copy(federate_set.begin(),federate_set.end(),federate_vector.begin());
Hi Benoit,
Nice to read you. Wasn't even sure you were still reading the list.
> I'd suggest using a back_inserter, something like this:
>
> std::vector<FederateHandle> federate_vector ;
> std::copy(federate_set.begin(),
> federate_set.end(),
> std::back_inserter(federate_vector));
>
> so that you don't have to worry about the size of federate_vector before
> calling std::copy().
I did not thought of the back_inserter usage it's definitely more STLish.
However now that I'm thinking about it. I may prefer the "size()" usage
which should trigger less memory allocation call because the vector will
have appropriate size from the beginning whereas the back_inserter usage
**may** trigger several re-allocation during the copy.
Thank you very much for your kind eye on CERTI.
--
Erk
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, (continued)
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, Martin Spott, 2009/05/26
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, Martin Spott, 2009/05/27
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, Eric Noulard, 2009/05/27
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, Martin Spott, 2009/05/27
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, Eric Noulard, 2009/05/27
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, Martin Spott, 2009/05/27
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, Martin Spott, 2009/05/27
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, Martin Spott, 2009/05/27
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio, Martin Spott, 2009/05/28
Re: [certi-dev] Solaris10/SunStudio, Benoît Bréholée, 2009/05/19
- Re: [certi-dev] Solaris10/SunStudio,
Eric Noulard <=