[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 21:13:07 -0400 |
> ping -c 4
>
> which will break when -c is changed to accept optional argument.
>
> Eh, why would this break anything? In the above example, you
> explictly give an argument to --count
It's still ambiguous. Please don't make this change.
I'll make it, but when I have convinced you all first. :-)
- [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/18
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/05/19
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ping, --count=NUMBER, Simon Josefsson, 2009/05/19
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/19
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/05/19
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/19
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/05/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Jeff Bailey, 2009/05/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/05/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Jeff Bailey, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/21