[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] Re: route
From: |
Debarshi Ray |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] Re: route |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:15:32 +0530 |
> LGPL2.1 is compatible with GPL version 3 and later.
> So if a library is released under LGPL 2.1, it can be used
> in inetutils.
Putting libroute under GPLv3+ is going to be a problem because GNOME
NetworkManager is under GPLv2+. I suggest we put libroute under
LGPLv3+.
NetworkManager is important because it is one program which will
benefit from libroute. NetworkManager is very much Linux kernel
specific, and does not run on *BSD. libroute can fix that and the
FreeBSD and NetworkManager folks are enthusiastic about it.
Regards,
Debarshi
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, (continued)
Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
[bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/27
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route,
Debarshi Ray <=
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
[bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/28
[bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/29
[bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/30