[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] route
From: |
Debarshi Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] route |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:18:53 +0530 |
2008/9/5 Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden>:
>
> >> Checking for the operating system is always the wrong way to do it,
> >> any such patch will be automatically rejected.
>
> Inetutils' ifconfig does something similar, and since it was not
> rejected, I don't agree with you.
>
> You are quite free to not agree, but it is not you who decide what
> goes into the tree or not.
Please include the list in the reply.
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route,
Debarshi Ray <=
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05