Re: [PATCH 2/2] Document POSIX obsolescence

[Paul Eggert]

On 2023-07-19 16:39, Bruno Haible wrote:
> It's good that you have access to this draft. I don't (paywall).

I didn't pay, unless one counts reviewing as a form of payment. 
Unfortunately I do not have time to review more than little dribs and 
drabs. The draft is getting fairly large.

I signed up for an account years ago, and eventually got access to 
drafts. <https://www.opengroup.org/austin/>.

> If encrypt() is going away, maybe crypt() is going away as well?

Apparently not. It's not listed as obsolescent on page 3698 line 127090 
of draft 3. (Did I say the draft was large? :-)