[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed
From: |
Harald Arnesen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:50:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
Harald Arnesen [2017-12-17 21:49]:
>> Works, both on Linux and macOS. Even better than expected, test 710
>> passed unexpectedly :-)
> This is unlikely. Please run
> make clean && make check
> to verify you don't use an old object file in your cobc binary.
I checked out a new copy from the subversion repository, and I STILL get
an unexpected pass on test 710.
BTW, the file "tarstamp.h" was missing from the checkout, so make
failed. I copied it from the v2.2 tarfile, and make succeded.
--
Hilsen Harald
- [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed,
Harald Arnesen <=
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/18