[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 2024 17:13:33 +0100 |
29 mars 2024 kl. 16.35 skrev Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
> The canonical sorting order for overlays is in compare_overlays,
> AFAIK.
Maybe, but I haven't see much Lisp code trying to use an order like that --
sorting overlays is common but is done with all kinds of orders. Perhaps I
haven't looked very carefully.
In any case, maybe compare_overlays would work as a starting point. It seems to
focus on vertical order (by priority), but much Lisp code sorts overlays
horizontally (by position).
> Makeinfo can handle @code{@var{..}} just fine, we have that in many
> other places, so that's not a concern. It is indeed possible to use
> @asis in @table, and then mark each @item with @code, but that's just
> too much trouble; "@table @code" exists to save us that...
Looking at the PDF makes me think that we should decide whether we prefer
@code{:keyword @var{variable}}
or
@code{:keyword} @var{variable}
in general. I can think of arguments for either but consistency would be even
better.
> I think the places where keywords don't have the @code markup are
> simply wrong.
Yes, I agree.
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, (continued)
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/23
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/03/23
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/23
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/03/25
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/03/29
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Daniel Mendler, 2024/03/29
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/03/29
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/29
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/03/29
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/29
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/29
bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/03/10
bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/03/11