|
From: | Gabriele Nicolardi |
Subject: | bug#69573: Eager macro-expansion failure: (wrong-type-argument integer-or-marker-p nil) |
Date: | Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:26:37 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
Michael Heerdegen via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> writes:I can't find a commit "ac89b1141a26" in my repository, though. Where does your Emacs come from (is it maybe a modified version)?Forget this question please. I can now reproduce with master, too. But: This is only reproducible when I build Emacs with native compilation enabled. Then I get this backtrace with your recipe: | Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument integer-or-marker-p nil) | forward-paragraph(1) | fill-forward-paragraph(1) | fill-region(11 528 left t) | easy-mmode--mode-docstring("MWE mode" "Mwe mode" mwe-mode-map mwe-mode nil) | #f(compiled-function (arg1 arg2 &rest rest) "Define a new minor mode MODE.... | elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil) When I load the source of paragraphs.el (where `forward-paragraph' is defined) the problem goes away.
I confirm that evaluating paragraphs.el makes the problem go away.
But why? I create a copy of the `re-search-forward` function because I DON'T want advice the original function:
;; The following breaks my minor-modes definitions (advice-add 're-search-forward-ifpmod :around #'make-search-sensitive-to-ifpmod-advice)
Why `forward-paragraph` should be sensitive to a function `re-search-forward-ifpmod` that it doesn't call?
Is my code wrong in some way?
I mean that I think that
(defalias 're-search-forward-ifpmod (symbol-function 're-search-forward) "Copy of `re-search-forward' function (to be) adviced to obey to `isearch-filter-predicate'")
should create a COPY, not an ALIAS, of the `re-search-forward` function indipendent of the original function.
Anyway, how can I force the loading of paragraphs.el? I don't se the "provide" feature and I need to share my code with my teammates.
Gabriele Nicolardi
Maybe Andrea can help? Just CC'd - I don't know how to continue here. Thx, Michael.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |