[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in
From: |
Konstantin Kharlamov |
Subject: |
bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:00:40 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.50.3 |
On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 06:57 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 19:58 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> > Mhm… Well, that does reduce the testcase to this code:
> >
> > ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
> > (progn
> > (defun hello()
> > (print "hello"))
> > (hello))
> >
> > So the function is defined in the same visibility scope as where
> > it's
> > used, right
> > before its use, but byte-compiler apparently doesn't see that.
>
> Turns out this false-positive is even more common than I thought.
>
> As upstream Emacs deprecated `defadvice`, I'm porting `lsp-mode`
> plugin
> to an `advice-add`. They use it as a debugging facility, and there's
> an
> "advicing" call inside a `(defun …)`, and the function is defined
> inside the same `(defun …)` as well. And it also triggers the same
> warning. In terms of minimal testcase:
>
> ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
> (defun foo ()
> (defun hello()
> (print "hello"))
> (hello))
An interesting fact: inserting a `(declare-function hello nil)` after a
`defun` suppresses the warning. So I guess `defun` should work somehow
similarly to `declare-function`.
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2024/02/14
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/14
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2024/02/14
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/14
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2024/02/14
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/14
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2024/02/14
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2024/02/14
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body,
Konstantin Kharlamov <=
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/15
- bug#69120: Spurious "function is not known to be defined" if defined in `use-package` body, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/15