[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#68244: hash-table improvements
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#68244: hash-table improvements |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:13:10 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
>> we can do something much simpler: vectors are accepted by
>> simply storing in the first field a reference to the actual obarray
>> object, so there's no need to play any games and/or share representation
>> between vectors and obarray.
>
> Why is that simpler than having `intern` accept both obarray objects and
> plain vectors, during a transitional period?
I don't know in which sense what I propose is different from what you
mean by "accept both obarray objects and plain vectors": what I propose
is a way to "accept both obarray objects and plain vectors".
Stefan
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/02/08
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/08
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/02/08
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/02/08
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/02/08
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/08
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/02/12
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/12
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/02/13
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/02/13
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/02/13
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/13
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/02/14
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/14